Originally posted by kenfa03
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
All joking aside...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Clay C View PostIn my opinion. The federal government has no business in social issues.
As far as fiscal responsibility goes, that is an unfortunately sad and true statement.
Will that gay couple not be married in those states?
Comment
-
All joking aside...
Originally posted by texansfan View PostSo if 47 states say gay marriage is OK what happens in those three states against it?
Will that gay couple not be married in those states?
Absolutely. Every state was never meant to agree on everything.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkLast edited by Clay C; 06-22-2016, 07:04 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostSo if 47 states say gay marriage is OK what happens in those three states against it?
Will that gay couple not be married in those states?
southern republican states forced them to address this issue
Comment
-
Originally posted by texansfan View PostSo if 47 states say gay marriage is OK what happens in those three states against it?
Will that gay couple not be married in those states?
Yep. The government shouldn't be involved in marriage period. And even if they are, it should only be state governments, not federal.
Comment
-
Firm believer that you have to own property and/or pay taxes to cast a vote...if you are on govt assistance, then no. There is no value in a system that has those on the take voting for those in power who in turn reward them for doing nothing.
THIS is our problem...only those that contribute to the tax base should be casting votes.
I have no problem with charity, but those receiving are giving power to lawmakers taking from the tax producers, to empower themselves from votes of the dead beats. It needs to stop.
~~~~~
To the OP...I fear the worst.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thorthunder View PostWell there you go. Simple fix......
Taking rights away from people because they don't live or believe like you do is a slippery slope. Next it'll be" only Christians can vote" or "only people with 50 or more acres". Or, Lord forbid, anyone who has purchased a semi auto rifle holding more than 8 rounds in a magazine cannot vote.
Yeah, I'm not so hip on taking away people's freedom and rights. You stand a better chance taking away their money.
Comment
-
Originally posted by XBowHunter View Posthas anyone else noticed that hardcore republicans really want to change the constitution?
Comment
Comment