Originally posted by tvc184
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Alec Baldwin involved with shooting.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Encinal View PostThe reason they have an armorer on set is exactly because these folks aren’t weapons experts. Armorer, 100% has explaining to do. Actor, not so much.
Call me a cynic, but no one is putting the Santa Fe DA on TV for a month for the Armorer alone, so here we are.
If you are handed a weapon, real or prop, and you are in possession of said weapon when it is discharged, who is the party that's responsible when someone is killed with said weapon?
If you handed a weapon to me, am I to 'assume ' that it's unloaded, or not?Last edited by Pstraw; 01-23-2023, 05:04 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pstraw View PostIf you are handed a weapon, real or prop, and you are in possession of said weapon when it is discharged, who is the party that's responsible when someone is killed with said weapon?
If you handed a weapon to me, am I to 'assume ' that it's unloaded, or not?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pstraw View PostIf you are handed a weapon, real or prop, and you are in possession of said weapon when it is discharged, who is the party that's responsible when someone is killed with said weapon?
If you handed a weapon to me, am I to 'assume ' that it's unloaded, or not?
Comment
-
Originally posted by bloodtrailer28 View PostYou'd think if your gona hire someone to handle weapons firearms ect you'd think you'd hire someone that is competent for the job. I'm sure theres been plenty of employers that have been held responsible for their employees actions. In fact I know there is because I'v3 been held responsible for my employees actions....accident or not.
Daddy hires a guide for his ranch the guide doesn't know a 150 from a 170 and wrong deer gets shot. Is it pops fault for hiring a guide who doesn't know his head from his *** or guides fault for being an idiot? Blame is placed on both imo.
I don’t see how that compares to this circumstance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tvc184 View PostSo being responsible as the boss doesn’t cross over into a criminal act.
Didn’t Alec Baldwin already “pay up”?Last edited by bloodtrailer28; 01-23-2023, 05:53 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bloodtrailer28 View PostHave no clue. To me someone's life is worth more than paying up maybe to some it isn't. You take a weapon from someone don't make sure it isn't loaded and pull the trigger killing someone you have alot of responsibility in the death of that person. Apparently the DA believes the same as they have charged him. Shooter and employer.
Certainly, we don’t know all the facts of the case and may not know the details of NM law and case law. Remember that George Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse were also charged in emotional and national news homicides. How’d that work out for the prosecution?
It is my opinion that it is not nearly so simplistic as people are making it out to be. Baldwin held a gun, it was fired, guilty. Uhhhh…. not necessarily.
Comment
-
Things we don't know about the prop gun Baldwin was supplied with.
1. Was is an authentic 1873 colt?
2. was it a more modern version?
3. did it have a fixed firing pin?
4. did it have a safety transfer bar like newer reproductions use?
5. did it have a floating firing pin?
All of these thing could help explain how the gun went off accidentally or on purpose.
So far the FBI forensics says it would have to have had the trigger pulled or hammer thumbed while the trigger was already pulled. Which was it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by muzzlebrake View PostThings we don't know about the prop gun Baldwin was supplied with.
1. Was is an authentic 1873 colt?
2. was it a more modern version?
3. did it have a fixed firing pin?
4. did it have a safety transfer bar like newer reproductions use?
5. did it have a floating firing pin?
All of these thing could help explain how the gun went off accidentally or on purpose.
So far the FBI forensics says it would have to have had the trigger pulled or hammer thumbed while the trigger was already pulled. Which was it?Last edited by rbsears; 01-24-2023, 12:13 AM.
Comment
-
Alec Baldwin involved with shooting.
Here’s a very detailed article about the court case and the events. The armourer said in 1 text that the “guns jammed” prior the day of the shooting. ***?
Also ,she was arguing about how man days she’d be paid at the higher armourer union rate, so she could go party in Denver”.
The 1st hearing in the New Mexico criminal case against the actor & armorer could prove a highly charged event
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
For authenticity, the movie industry uses real weapons. A relative was a property master on many movies, and he would be the person who would rent the firearms from a supply company. I think he had an FFL, but it's been years and I'm not sure.
There was somebody else in the production company as the armourer whose job was to be responsible for them at the production set, storage, cleaning, actor training and SAFETY.
Comment
Comment