Originally posted by Mexico
View Post
X
-
Originally posted by Mexico View PostAny time you can pull out a W without your starting quarterback is a great day. True testament to the defense.
Defense did good but nothing great
Comment
-
Originally posted by warrington View PostWouldn't say that the defense did any better than a normal game this year. I believe I was actually rush played as good as he could and he won the game
Defense did good but nothing great
Rush didn't IMPRESS me either, EXCEPT it was good enough to win, barely. That makes it great.
Comment
-
Originally posted by warrington View PostWouldn't say that the defense did any better than a normal game this year. I believe I was actually rush played as good as he could and he won the game
Defense did good but nothing great
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mexico View PostHmmm ... Vikings completed 1 of 13 3rd downs. That's just a 7 percent completion. Normal defense? Ok
Comment
-
Originally posted by bullets13 View PostWhat a win! This was the kind of game that Garrett would’ve lost 24-9.
I only got to watch the 4th, but that same thought occurred to me several times.
I’m watching the giants right now and the last 5 offensive plays before the half were…
1st & 10, False start
1st & 15, Holding
1st & 25, inside draw handoff
2nd & 11, delay of game
2nd & 16, kneel down
“That’s Jason Garrett football ladies and gents!”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dale Moser View PostI only got to watch the 4th, but that same thought occurred to me several times.
I’m watching the giants right now and the last 5 offensive plays before the half were…
1st & 10, False start
1st & 15, Holding
1st & 25, inside draw handoff
2nd & 11, delay of game
2nd & 16, kneel down
“That’s Jason Garrett football ladies and gents!”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Artos View PostImagine what the score would have been if the vikes had their starting QB playing the whole game & not injured...I mean we had 100% equal playing ground comparison for this game with both starters out.
If they had their starting QB on the field the cowboy defense would have been demolished.
What point are you trying so hard to make without actually saying it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Artos View PostImagine what the score would have been if the vikes had their starting QB playing the whole game & not injured...I mean we had 100% equal playing ground comparison for this game with both starters out.
If they had their starting QB on the field the cowboy defense would have been demolished.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Artos View PostImagine what the score would have been if the vikes had their starting QB playing the whole game & not injured...I mean we had 100% equal playing ground comparison for this game with both starters out.
If they had their starting QB on the field the cowboy defense would have been demolished.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Artos View PostImagine what the score would have been if the vikes had their starting QB playing the whole game & not injured...I mean we had 100% equal playing ground comparison for this game with both starters out.
If they had their starting QB on the field the cowboy defense would have been demolished.
Comment
-
lol...give me your score if senor dak had been able to play & kirk missed the game since our defense was marginal. Seriously, imagine the comments if the tables were reversed. It would be as if we beat a HS team.
I'm just jack'n with the haters...cylinders are firing & the season feels good is all. It's Been a while so Sorry for the morbid humor.
Comment
Comment