X
-
Originally posted by Crazy Horse View PostId bet they didn’t....
They would have carried dry beans with them on the trail, not canned...
The dry beans would have taken longer to cook than the chili itself & tasted like rocks...
How many of those who put beans in their chili, do so without using canned precooked beans?
Unless there were beans left from a previous meal...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Smart View PostYou should convince your wife to switch the kidneys to pintos.. I'm not a huge kidney bean fan but i will certainly eat them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Crazy Horse View PostOh boy...
Ok I’ll bite...
“Chili” is short for CHILI CON CARNE & “chili” con carne does not have beans...
It’s why even today there isn’t a single nationally recognized/sanctioned chili competition that allows fillers; beans nor pasta...
With beans, it’s chili con carne CON FRIJOLES....
Chili in English is Hot Dog Topping.
Comment
-
Let’s get nasty! Beans in Chili Prove me wrong
Originally posted by Crazy Horse View PostYes sir....thus still making it chili WITH BEANS, not chili....
Beans are added & not apart of the chili....
Stop shootin holes in my hole shootin!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Smart View PostI have if that’s what we have made or in a can when we want to get the concession stand experience [emoji23]. ... same with frito chili pie. We aren’t a fickle bunch of eaters around this place.
But ya gonna use chili cheese Fritos!
Same...
Comment
-
Beans were not an issue until the Texas chili cookoffs started, then in Terlingua, Texas in 1967 the CASI rules banned beans. Now all the experts claim there never was beans in real chili. But there is no evidence to back up that claim.
Besides, who is important enough to tell anyone of us how to cook chili? Cook your chili your way, if the chili snob or slob doesn't like it, let the slob cook his own chili.
Comment
Comment