Originally posted by Chase This!
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2020 College Football - Off Season Discussion
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
The whole avg rated recruit or ratio argument is dumb. Below are pure facts
Texas AM - 26 signees, take away our bottom 7 guys (bread or depth) and we have a 0.93 avg
Texas - 19 signees - avg 0.91+
So yes with 19 guys you have a higher avg, but that’s OnLy because we brought in more depth guys. Our top 19 are better than yours, and we have more depth guys to fill in. Win win win. This is an example to illustrate this whole “yeah but our avg recruit ranking is better” is fake news.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chase This! View Post#newcarsmell #longestlasting
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yall got a great class, you dont need to muk it up with false information.
Sent from my SM-G973U using TapatalkLast edited by Birddog66; 02-06-2020, 08:04 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EastTexasMan View PostThe whole avg rated recruit or ratio argument is dumb. Below are pure facts
Texas AM - 26 signees, take away our bottom 7 guys (bread or depth) and we have a 0.93 avg
Texas - 19 signees - avg 0.91+
So yes with 19 guys you have a higher avg, but that’s OnLy because we brought in more depth guys. Our top 19 are better than yours, and we have more depth guys to fill in. Win win win. This is an example to illustrate this whole “yeah but our avg recruit ranking is better” is fake news.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Calling kids bread is dumb as well when considering TCU and Baylor have held their own against the blue chips.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EastTexasMan View PostThe whole avg rated recruit or ratio argument is dumb. Below are pure facts
Texas AM - 26 signees, take away our bottom 7 guys (bread or depth) and we have a 0.93 avg
Texas - 19 signees - avg 0.91+
So yes with 19 guys you have a higher avg, but that’s OnLy because we brought in more depth guys. Our top 19 are better than yours, and we have more depth guys to fill in. Win win win. This is an example to illustrate this whole “yeah but our avg recruit ranking is better” is fake news.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by JeffK View PostHow do you put a number (ranking) on how talented a kid is? What does a 0.1 difference amount to?
Calling kids bread is dumb as well when considering TCU and Baylor have held their own against the blue chips.Last edited by Chad C; 02-06-2020, 08:23 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EastTexasMan View PostThe whole avg rated recruit or ratio argument is dumb. Below are pure facts
Texas AM - 26 signees, take away our bottom 7 guys (bread or depth) and we have a 0.93 avg
Texas - 19 signees - avg 0.91+
So yes with 19 guys you have a higher avg, but that’s OnLy because we brought in more depth guys. Our top 19 are better than yours, and we have more depth guys to fill in. Win win win. This is an example to illustrate this whole “yeah but our avg recruit ranking is better” is fake news.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
Comment