Hadn't been on here in a while Shane. Just seeing this today! WOW!! what a beautiful buck!! Hardest thing you gotta figg'r out now is what pose to mount that magnificent deer in!! Congratulations sir on a deer that'll stand as a lifetime buck for sure!!
-
-
Can you share some of the basic measurements??
width (and which beams were used)?
Mass total?
Beam lengths?
Did you weigh him? He looks like a toad... We've been killin' some 250# bucks on our place in Webb county and I just cannot get over how big they are and the size of even the doe's heads! It's like a whole other sub-species of deer. Your's looks like he's got a head big as a mulie!Comment
-
CongratsComment
-
Gross NT score in the 180's easyComment
-
Wow congratsComment
-
Awesome deer, congratulations to you!Comment
-
Great deer- not sure how I missed it.
Now for the pot stirring
We would call that a double main beam buck 
Triple main beam for us would be 3 on one side. By this definition, every buck is basically a double main beam buck LOL
As for scoring, the second main beam would be considered abnormal and scored as such. Spread would be based on the two more typical main beams. The mass measurement on the double main beam side would still be above the 2nd beam thus resulting in a normal mass measurement there vs a very large under that would be under the 2nd beam. As to whether the 2nd beam should be measured as another beam from the base, I'd probably lean to measuring from where it sprouts off the main beam as you would do with abnormal points any where else on the rack. That would result in a shorter measurement than doing the full beam length there. IMO
And as I write this, I just remembered we were going to get together. Is that still something you have or did you move on from it? Sorry it totally slipped by mind after we postponed around the Astros playoff games
Comment
-
No I'm still good.Originally posted by buck_wild View PostGreat deer- not sure how I missed it.
Now for the pot stirring We would call that a double main beam buck Triple main beam for us would be 3 on one side. By this definition, every buck is basically a double main beam buck LOL
As for scoring, the second main beam would be considered abnormal and scored as such. Spread would be based on the two more typical main beams. The mass measurement on the double main beam side would still be above the 2nd beam thus resulting in a normal mass measurement there vs a very large under that would be under the 2nd beam. As to whether the 2nd beam should be measured as another beam from the base, I'd probably lean to measuring from where it sprouts off the main beam as you would do with abnormal points any where else on the rack. That would result in a shorter measurement than doing the full beam length there. IMO
And as I write this, I just remembered we were going to get together. Is that still something you have or did you move on from it? Sorry it totally slipped by mind after we postponed around the Astros playoff games let me know when you can meet up amigo
Sent from my SM-G930T using TapatalkComment
-
Ggreat deer!Comment
-
I bet if you lined up a thousand random 166 inch deer..... He would be in the top 3 favorites.Originally posted by Mexico View PostLol... sorry boys. Much debate on the score. I've had 2 official scores... one was 162 and the other 166 I'm not that worried about it... he's a unique deer of a lifetime... and another Angadi jacket to remember him by... Viva!
Sent from my SM-G930T using TapatalkComment
-
Man! Heckuva deer!Comment
-
Awesome buck
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk ProComment
-
Buck of a lifetime for sure. Congrats!Comment
Comment