Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amber Guyger

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by BrianL View Post
    CHAPTER 19. CRIMINAL HOMICIDE



    Sec. 19.01. TYPES OF CRIMINAL HOMICIDE. (a) A person commits criminal homicide if he intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence causes the death of an individual.

    (b) Criminal homicide is murder, capital murder, manslaughter, or criminally negligent homicide.


    Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 1123, ch. 426, art. 2, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.




    Sec. 19.02. MURDER. (a) In this section:

    (1) "Adequate cause" means cause that would commonly produce a degree of anger, rage, resentment, or terror in a person of ordinary temper, sufficient to render the mind incapable of cool reflection.

    (2) "Sudden passion" means passion directly caused by and arising out of provocation by the individual killed or another acting with the person killed which passion arises at the time of the offense and is not solely the result of former provocation.

    (b) A person commits an offense if he:

    (1) intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual;


    (2) intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual; or

    (3) commits or attempts to commit a felony, other than manslaughter, and in the course of and in furtherance of the commission or attempt, or in immediate flight from the commission or attempt, he commits or attempts to commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual.

    (c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a felony of the first degree.

    (d) At the punishment stage of a trial, the defendant may raise the issue as to whether he caused the death under the immediate influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause. If the defendant proves the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the offense is a felony of the second degree.


    Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 1123, ch. 426, art. 2, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.




    Sec. 19.03. CAPITAL MURDER. (a) A person commits an offense if the person commits murder as defined under Section 19.02(b)(1) and:

    (1) the person murders a peace officer or fireman who is acting in the lawful discharge of an official duty and who the person knows is a peace officer or fireman;

    (2) the person intentionally commits the murder in the course of committing or attempting to commit kidnapping, burglary, robbery, aggravated sexual assault, arson, obstruction or retaliation, or terroristic threat under Section 22.07(a)(1), (3), (4), (5), or (6);

    (3) the person commits the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration or employs another to commit the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration;

    (4) the person commits the murder while escaping or attempting to escape from a penal institution;

    (5) the person, while incarcerated in a penal institution, murders another:

    (A) who is employed in the operation of the penal institution; or

    (B) with the intent to establish, maintain, or participate in a combination or in the profits of a combination;

    (6) the person:

    (A) while incarcerated for an offense under this section or Section 19.02, murders another; or

    (B) while serving a sentence of life imprisonment or a term of 99 years for an offense under Section 20.04, 22.021, or 29.03, murders another;

    (7) the person murders more than one person:

    (A) during the same criminal transaction; or

    (B) during different criminal transactions but the murders are committed pursuant to the same scheme or course of conduct;

    (8) the person murders an individual under 10 years of age;

    (9) the person murders an individual 10 years of age or older but younger than 15 years of age; or

    (10) the person murders another person in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of the other person as a judge or justice of the supreme court, the court of criminal appeals, a court of appeals, a district court, a criminal district court, a constitutional county court, a statutory county court, a justice court, or a municipal court.

    (b) An offense under this section is a capital felony.

    (c) If the jury or, when authorized by law, the judge does not find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offense under this section, he may be convicted of murder or of any other lesser included offense.


    After reading this more thoroughly, murder may have been the right charge. My Law and Order law degree had me thinking differently about the terminology, and intent.
    To me, in this case, intent would have been her leaving her vehicle and going to this man's apartment to kill him.

    Yes, once she pulled her weapon and fired, she intended to kill him, just as any police officer is trained to do, shoot center mass and stop the threat.

    She didn't intend to walk through his door and kill him.

    Comment


      Originally posted by COACH_EM_UP View Post
      And you are wrong about the definition of manslaughter, voluntary or involuntary and criminally negligent homicide.

      So, again, if someone is breaking into a home and the homeowner shoots them with the intent to kill them with their firearm, is it murder. They intended to kill the person.
      I can explain it to you, but I can understand it for you.

      Obviously not. That is justifiable homicide. But that's not what happened here is it?

      Comment


        Originally posted by 35remington View Post
        Her own testimony is that she INTENDED to kill him.
        yep. people keep glossing over that. the defense put her up there to admit she intended to kill him to take manslaughter off the table believing they wouldn't convict of murder. but, the judge still allowed manslaughter and the jury still convicted murder.

        Comment


          Originally posted by 35remington View Post
          Her own testimony is that she INTENDED to kill him.
          Yeah, if you thought you had just found your door ajar, opened it and saw a silhouette you should shoot with intent to kill.

          Comment


            Originally posted by DeadEyeB View Post
            You are the one sticking up for a murderer lol. I'm telling you the facts of the case. You haven't paid attention at all. You're just blindly trying to stick up for a mad woman who killed a person in cold blood.

            Sickening.
            Yeah, that's it. I have not paid attention because I dont blindly speak of something that I know nothing about. I have not paid attention because I ask for sources of your rambling. I am not sticking up for a murderer. I think she should pay the price for her actions, but I dont think her actions warranted a murder conviction. Yeah, I am sticking up for a woman that I do not know from Adam. Nice try there bud. Keep on rambling.

            I actually think you should be upset with the verdict. If she did what you claim, that it was pre-meditated and that she is a cold blooded killer, I would think you would want her to be charged and convicted of capital murder. By your way of thinking, that is the definition of capital murder.

            Comment


              Originally posted by 67olds442 View Post
              I feel exactly the same
              As do I.

              Comment


                Originally posted by 35remington View Post
                Her own testimony is that she INTENDED to kill him.
                The was the question and answer that did her in. Poorly worded and not well thought out answer on her part.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by flywise View Post
                  Yeah, if you thought you had just found your door ajar, opened it and saw a silhouette you should shoot with intent to kill.
                  No kidding, if I think I am in my own place and their is someone inside I am shooting to kill... I am having a difficult time understanding how people do not understand this.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by jshouse View Post
                    To me, in this case, intent would have been her leaving her vehicle and going to this man's apartment to kill him.

                    Yes, once she pulled her weapon and fired, she intended to kill him, just as any police officer is trained to do, shoot center mass and stop the threat.

                    She didn't intend to walk through his door and kill him.
                    Had she done that it would be capital murder.


                    If she was walking by, pulled her gun to unload and accidentally fired thru his door and killed him...manslaughter.

                    (1) intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual..... Murder

                    Comment


                      I don’t know what you think you’re reading but these links do absolutely nothing to support your position. The supposed noise complaint occurred while she was at work.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by 3DW5 View Post
                        No kidding, if I think I am in my own place and their is someone inside I am shooting to kill... I am having a difficult time understanding how people do not understand this.
                        Because the rest of us are reasonable people that don't think breaking and entering should be a capital offense with ourselves as judge, jury and executioner. I would much rather buy another TV than shoot someone.

                        Actually being at home, and someone entering, is a completely different narrative.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by 3DW5 View Post
                          No kidding, if I think I am in my own place and their is someone inside I am shooting to kill... I am having a difficult time understanding how people do not understand this.
                          Originally posted by Leverhunter View Post
                          I don’t know what you think you’re reading but these links do absolutely nothing to support your position. The supposed noise complaint occurred while she was at work.
                          Both of you stop it. You are making too much sense. Goodness. You two are blindly defending a murderer. How dare you!

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by 3DW5 View Post
                            No kidding, if I think I am in my own place and their is someone inside I am shooting to kill... I am having a difficult time understanding how people do not understand this.
                            Id bet that **** near every gun owner on this site has said as much at one time or another.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by BuckSmasher View Post
                              Because the rest of us are reasonable people that don't think breaking and entering should be a capital offense with ourselves as judge, jury and executioner. I would much rather buy another TV than shoot someone.

                              Actually being at home, and someone entering, is a completely different narrative.
                              Good luck if someone ever breaks into your house and steals your tv. I hope they dont point a gun at you or anyone you love, while they are committing the crime, because you are the one that we will be reading the story about. Just make sure you are positive that they have the tv in their hands before they point their gun at you, that way you will know that they did not mean you any harm and all they wanted was your TV. Would you grab a firearm when you come out of your room to investigate the noise in your house or would you go out there with nothing? Heaven forbid that you startle the burglar and they shoot you. But hey, its ok. They were just stealing my TV. Good luck man.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X