One thing to consider. The better and clearer the binos the less eye strain. I use my Swaro 10x42 alot and my eyes don't get tired like they did when using cheapos.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Swarovski EL Binoculars - Thoughts? Are they worth the money?
Collapse
X
-
I just bought some 10x42 leica geovid hd b rangefinder binos from Euro optics. They have them on sale for 2150 and they're normally 3k. I've had swaro slc's and the glass is about the same to me in the leicas. Don't think you can go wrong with swarovski, Zeiss, or leica.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Have used my Vortex Diamonbacks next to Zies and Swaro in the field for short stints of time in daylight hours and could hardly tell a difference (certainly not a $2,000 difference). Have never compared them in low light conditions but there is not enough low light minutes in the day compared to daylight minutes to justify the price for me even if they are a lot better in low light. I primarily whitetail hunt at close quarters so my opinion would probably be different if my hunting methods required lots of time behind the glass at longer distances.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Comanchehunter View PostThe challenge is being able to afford glass to put on your gun that matches up in low light.
One of the best purchases I've made.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I now have a pair of HD 10x42 ELs. And they are worth every dang cent. If you compare in a store you can't tell. If you sit in a blind and look for a few minutes here and there you can start to tell. If you glass for hours and hours you'll KNOW. Put it this way. Good optics you can see to the dark timber lines. See the sunny spots back in there and catch movement. With my ELs I can see IN the dark timber and tell WHAT is in there moving around. Best piece of hunting equipment I own.
On a mule deer hunt years ago I wondered how these guys were seeing some of these deer. I had some minox 10x42s. Two others had ELs. Once I got mine I now know. The clarity. Brightness. No eye strain. It all starts showing up. If you can afford them that is absolutely the way to go. Compared them side by side to my dads Vortex Razor HD 10x42. I let him compare first. Both of us agree there is a substantial difference even in those. You get what you pay for.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Codie View PostHave used my Vortex Diamonbacks next to Zies and Swaro in the field for short stints of time in daylight hours and could hardly tell a difference (certainly not a $2,000 difference). Have never compared them in low light conditions but there is not enough low light minutes in the day compared to daylight minutes to justify the price for me even if they are a lot better in low light. I primarily whitetail hunt at close quarters so my opinion would probably be different if my hunting methods required lots of time behind the glass at longer distances.
Comment
-
I am going against the grain I guess, but I say no. I have both a set of Swaros and I have a set of Nikons. One thing to consider is that good glass is heavy. If you are going to spend a bunch of time packing them around, the swaros just weigh more. In good light I can't see much difference. In low light that is where the good glass really shines so to speak. I would say that if money is no object then get the swaros. If you are on a budget there are multiple mid level binos that you will be satisfied with and then spend the extra on something else.
Comment
Comment