I am working with a picatinny rail manufacturer in another state to design a rail that will fit a Ruger 96/22 (basically a lever-action 10/22). Initially, I sent him an OEM weaver rail with the proper hole spacing and we thought this was going to be very easy: just require drilling a new hole pattern into the manufacturer's existing 10/22 picatinny rails. However, we have since realized that not only do the two receivers have different hole patterns, but also different slopes, dimensions, and radiuses. The manufacturer doesn't have a 96/22 receiver in front of him to go by, and is relying on me to take measurements and photos via phone and email. It's a PITA. If he had a model, this would be a cake walk.
If I could find someone with a 3D printer, would this work for the purposes of test-fitting a rail? I could send the 3D clone to the manufacturer and not worry about FFLs, much less the fact that the 96/22 is essentially unobtanium and would be expensive and difficult to replace if lost.
Thanks, all.
If I could find someone with a 3D printer, would this work for the purposes of test-fitting a rail? I could send the 3D clone to the manufacturer and not worry about FFLs, much less the fact that the 96/22 is essentially unobtanium and would be expensive and difficult to replace if lost.
Thanks, all.
Comment