Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wall or no wall?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Build a wall!! Don't care if it works, I just want to see if that kid from Cali will cut his junk off.

    Comment


      #62
      Maybe in high traffic areas but a physical wall the entire length would be a major waste of money. Much better spent on more agents and then letting said agents do their job the way they need to.


      That along with not giving benefits and not letting people stay once they're here will work best

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Buckley99 View Post
        Build a wall!! Don't care if it works, I just want to see if that kid from Cali will cut his junk off.
        HAHA!

        I say build the dang wall!

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by grizzman View Post
          Interlocking fields of fire with M-2 HB .50 cal all the way across.
          I'm thinking Howitzer with grape shot about every 2000 yards or so. [emoji3]

          Sent from my SM-T817V using Tapatalk

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Buckley99 View Post
            Build a wall!! Don't care if it works, I just want to see if that kid from Cali will cut his junk off.
            Agreed!

            Comment


              #66
              It should look like this.
              Attached Files

              Comment


                #67
                Not a fan of the wall, American citizens own the property that wall will be built on, who are we to tell them they have to sacrifice their rights. I'm more of put a rifleman in towers along the border, when they come across and set foot on American soil leave them laying there, wouldn't take all that many to see a noticeable decrease in traffic.

                Comment


                  #68
                  In all seriousness, one type of wall is not a literal wall, but one that might be as effective as anything that can be done: that is to enforce labor laws. When a company is caught employing a worker that is in the USA illegally, they should pay a hefty fine, and that fine should double with each occurrence. The fines can and should be steep enough that it is totally cost prohibitive to employ illegals. This folks, is doable.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by tex4k View Post
                    Not a fan of the wall, American citizens own the property that wall will be built on, who are we to tell them they have to sacrifice their rights. I'm more of put a rifleman in towers along the border, when they come across and set foot on American soil leave them laying there, wouldn't take all that many to see a noticeable decrease in traffic.
                    Since Mexico is going to pay for it, let's put it on their side!

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by DarrellS View Post
                      I'm thinking Howitzer with grape shot about every 2000 yards or so. [emoji3]

                      Sent from my SM-T817V using Tapatalk
                      Flechettes. I saw a demo with a 105mm at Ft. Benning in 1979 in IOBC. They had targets out there and it just destroyed them.

                      Comment


                        #71
                        Wall

                        Comment


                          #72
                          I think the wall is needed and I think Mexico will not pay for it. So this means the bill is on the American people. We're ok with this?

                          Comment


                            #73
                            Originally posted by TxsBuda View Post
                            I think the wall is needed and I think Mexico will not pay for it. So this means the bill is on the American people. We're ok with this?
                            I think the guberment collected enough taxes off guns and ammo from the past 8 yrs to pay for it.
                            So techincally its already paid for, but waiting on Mexico to reimburse, 'We the people' is another story

                            Comment


                              #74
                              Originally posted by akstigo01 View Post
                              It should look like this.
                              X2

                              Comment


                                #75
                                Originally posted by That Guy View Post
                                I think the guberment collected enough taxes off guns and ammo from the past 8 yrs to pay for it.
                                So techincally its already paid for, but waiting on Mexico to reimburse, 'We the people' is another story
                                You mean the money collected from the Pittman Robertson Act. Money that goes to state wildlife agencies for conservation efforts, hunter's education and shooting projects and programs.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X