No warming for 50 years?

[flywise]

http://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/

Now common, surly the gov. and scientists from around the world have not been pulling the wool over your head for the last 15 years just to make money and burden people with stupid socialist regulations

[unclefish]

Saw that on Drudge.

AGW is the biggest scam ever perpetuated on the American people.

[DJM]

http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/

Now common, surly the gov. and scientists from around the world have not been pulling the wool over your head for the last 15 years just to make money and burden people with stupid socialist regulations

Remember "acid rain" and the "hole in the ozone layer"?Those are actually still problems ,just not politically popular,and won't rile up "the base".


DJ

[rbsears]

Saw that on Drudge.

AGW is the biggest scam ever perpetuated on the American people.

Sadly have to agree. I love the avatar. Gave me a chuckle.

[1369]

http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/

Now common, surly the gov. and scientists from around the world have not been pulling the wool over your head for the last 15 years just to make money and burden people with stupid socialist regulations

They may have not been pulling the wool over our heads, but evidently the English teachers have been.

[Be10dwn]

They have have not been pulling the wool over our heads, but evidently the English teachers have been.

I laughed.

[flywise]

They may have not been pulling the wool over our heads, but evidently the English teachers have been.

Which part did i screw up this time

[RR 314]

Which part did i screw up this time

Eyes. . . head. Whatever.

[SOLID EAGLE]

http://realclimatescience.com/2016/0...-for-58-years/

Now common, surly the gov. and scientists from around the world have not been pulling the wool over your head for the last 15 years just to make money and burden people with stupid socialist regulations

You're just going to confuse the sheep with this. Please just follow the narrative that has been laid out for you by the elite.

[kyle1974]

the actual data must be ignored in order to understand AGW. The theoretical models are FAR more accurate that use assumptions and predictive trend lines.


right?

[flywise]

You're just going to confuse the sheep with this. Please just follow the narrative that has been laid out for you by the elite.

i think i already have

[Big Red 82]

There is always one at least !

[Playa]

the actual data must be ignored in order to understand AGW. The theoretical models are FAR more accurate that use assumptions and predictive trend lines.


right?

Yes theoretical is always more reliable that actual verifiable facts...

[DJM]

This will run it's course and in a few years there'll be another global crisis that can be "solved" through regulations.


DJ

[AntlerCollector]

Remember "acid rain" and the "hole in the ozone layer"?Those are actually still problems ,just not politically popular,and won't rile up "the base".


DJ

Actually the hole in the o-zone was caused by the big hair fad in the 80's and all the hair spray women used to get that big hair look.