Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fake invasion on Texas? What do y'all think?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Why can't they do this type of training right down on the border and actually get some hands on experience defending this Country?

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Thumper View Post
      Why can't they do this type of training right down on the border and actually get some hands on experience defending this Country?
      They won't allow that. "Someone's" Obummer appointed Rights might get violated.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Brazos Hunter View Post
        They won't allow that. "Someone's" Obummer appointed Rights might get violated.
        I think you're right. Now that you mentioned it, the last time we defended Bastrop was in March of 1836.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Brazos Hunter View Post
          The training in and of itself does not bother me. Anyone that has laced up boots knows this happens. My problem is with the current admin's agenda...
          Whats strange to me..is this multi-state training is happening with this administration(that is anti-military)....and at the second half of 'O's second term.... There may be nothing to it..but things are strange anymore....As in we allow foreigners to cross our borders no problem..and allow unfriendly forces to train on sites in our homeland....

          Comment


            #35
            methinks a bunch of you are nuts.
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #36
              methinks a bunch of you are nuts.
              Lots of folks used to say this about preppers....Now? not so much....mainly libs....

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Keg View Post
                Lots of folks used to say this about preppers....Now? not so much....mainly libs....
                Lol OK. You don't have to be a lib to think this crap is insanely stupid

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Keg View Post
                  Whats strange to me..is this multi-state training is happening with this administration(that is anti-military)....and at the second half of 'O's second term.... There may be nothing to it..but things are strange anymore....As in we allow foreigners to cross our borders no problem..and allow unfriendly forces to train on sites in our homeland....
                  What gets my goat the most is not one single media rep has ever mentioned what he wrote his agenda is in his book. They just say he doesn't know what he is doing. I beg to differ, he knows exactly what he is doing and not one person is calling him out on it.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Keg View Post
                    Lots of folks used to say this about preppers....Now? not so much....mainly libs....
                    After Katrina, I got serious about it all. Not over the top hording but doing my best to be ready if any situation arises out of the norm.

                    It's also funny how a few yrs ago I said the "sky was falling" and I was told to adjust my foil hat. Now, most that told me that are running around saying the sky is falling themselves...

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Brazos Hunter View Post
                      After Katrina, I got serious about it all. Not over the top hording but doing my best to be ready if any situation arises out of the norm.

                      It's also funny how a few yrs ago I said the "sky was falling" and I was told to adjust my foil hat. Now, most that told me that are running around saying the sky is falling themselves...
                      There's nothing wrong with being prepared. That doesn't equate with what that article is saying. The article is red meat intended for conspiracy theorists. As someone else said, the author thinks that 9/11 was an inside job. That should automatically eliminate any serious consideration of his writing.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by Brazos Hunter View Post
                        What gets my goat the most is not one single media rep has ever mentioned what he wrote his agenda is in his book. They just say he doesn't know what he is doing. I beg to differ, he knows exactly what he is doing and not one person is calling him out on it.
                        I agree..he knows exactly what he is doing....But he's just a puppet....


                        After Katrina, I got serious about it all. Not over the top hording but doing my best to be ready if any situation arises out of the norm.
                        The one's who ain't will be goners quick....

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by sethcros View Post
                          There's nothing wrong with being prepared. That doesn't equate with what that article is saying. The article is red meat intended for conspiracy theorists. As someone else said, the author thinks that 9/11 was an inside job. That should automatically eliminate any serious consideration of his writing.
                          That's what many said about that crazy guy Einstein...I bet you are using one of his crazy inventions right now though... I'm not saying that knucklehead is Einstein mind you. I'm just saying don't discredit everything the man says. A great deal of the actions he reports is true but not necessarily the motives.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Brazos Hunter View Post
                            That's what many said about that crazy guy Einstein...I bet you are using one of his crazy inventions right now though... I'm not saying that knucklehead is Einstein mind you. I'm just saying don't discredit everything the man says. A great deal of the actions he reports is true but not necessarily the motives.
                            I get your point, but this dude has an agenda, and truth isn't it. It's making bank. In this context, I would say that motive is important, wouldn't you?

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by sethcros View Post
                              I get your point, but this dude has an agenda, and truth isn't it. It's making bank. In this context, I would say that motive is important, wouldn't you?
                              The prez?

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by Keg View Post
                                The prez?
                                Well that could be argued, but I meant the author of this article.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X