Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What is the fine for killing a Timber Rattler?
Collapse
X
-
I'm gonna re-drag up this thread
Originally posted by BowSlayer View PostI don't really care what you and your tree hugging buddies experience. Calling a grown man a liar when you have no first-hand knowledge of his experience is pretty lame.
Originally posted by prkchp View PostIsn't saying he's not a reputable source the same as calling him a liar?
I'll play the "who has handled more snakes" game with you.
I spent a bunch of years chasing them, and now it seems like they find me.
Drives Courtney crazy......
Comment
-
Interesting thread pulled from the grave.
I think one of things that isn't being discussed, which colors perspective here is that Timber Rattlers while protected and threatened appear to be doing well WHERE they STILL exist.
So a guy that commonly encounters them, likely takes their existence for granted. These are also the same individuals that may not understand the habitat they are encountering them in is less and less intact within our state. A lack of awareness of just how important that place, area or region may be.
In fact, having timber rattlers on your place says something about the health of the habitat. You see, timber rattlesnake populations are robust in very local areas, because they are able to persist. On the other hand they do not recover without specific habitat requirements. So, once the habitat is manipulated past a certain point the species will not recover without management. Like many other species, timber rattlers are like the canary in the coal mine and help to establish just how healthy, complete and "wild" an ecosystem is.
In other words, they may scare the crap out of you, but they are a very real part of a functioning wild place.
Comment
-
I have a timber rattler on my place that looks like a dang python. One died of natural causes a few years ago that was 7ft4 and probably weighed 50 lbs. This one is much larger. He hangs around my ground blinds...
SnakeID, whats the best snake repellent to put in the blinds so my nephews don't encounter him in the dark?
Comment
-
Originally posted by GarGuy View PostI have a timber rattler on my place that looks like a dang python. One died of natural causes a few years ago that was 7ft4 and probably weighed 50 lbs. This one is much larger. He hangs around my ground blinds...
SnakeID, whats the best snake repellent to put in the blinds so my nephews don't encounter him in the dark?
Comment
-
Originally posted by GarGuy View PostI have a timber rattler on my place that looks like a dang python. One died of natural causes a few years ago that was 7ft4 and probably weighed 50 lbs. This one is much larger. He hangs around my ground blinds...
SnakeID, whats the best snake repellent to put in the blinds so my nephews don't encounter him in the dark?
50lbsnext thing you know you'll be trying to tell people you caught an 8 ft gar
Comment
-
Originally posted by SnakeID View PostSure, I know it's rude to call someone a liar. But as a scientist, and researcher (chemist), it's my experience to doubt everything until I see proof or experience it myself, or have MULTIPLE independent verifications. I only have faith in one thing I don't have proof for, and it's certainly not other men.
Sir if you in fact are a chemist, then you and I both know your comments are incorrect/invalid simply because you "forgot" to factor in reproducibility and repeatability.
"...researcher (chemist), it's my experience to doubt everything until I see proof or experience it myself, or have MULTIPLE independent verifications."
And within those independent verifications are there not "outliers" that must be considered/accounted? Yes, there are & you know it.
The research/analysist of animal behaviour recently seen a renewal of internal concerns about reproducible results, correct? So based on this theory it is possible both gentleman's experiences CAN differ from yours. Correct?
Your comments CAN NOT be claimed as commensurate because they were NOT obtained in experimental trials according to the same reproducible experimental description and procedure; only yours/your friend's experiences are being factored under faulty/improper conditions, thus are no more conjecture than the gentleman whom have posted their's. Correct?
Repeatability conditions are when replicate measurements are made in one laboratory, by a single analyst, using the same equipment over a short time period.
Unless you and these gentleman interacted with the same snake in the same controlled environment, then you CAN NOT claim your analysis of said specimen correct/superior; your conditions differ, thus so do your individual results. Correct?
If you are going to apply a scientific method to the conversation, as a researcher/chemist, shame on you for not including EVERYTHING, not just that which supports your claims.
Originally posted by SnakeID View PostHow's this:
"Your experience is suspect and non-congruent with data collected from several thousand reputable sources. While it's possible, the validity cannot be confirmed without multiple independent verifications. The interpretation of the event may not be an accurate depiction of what transpired."
How's that? I didn't call you a liar that time!
I appears to me, that as a researcher, it is best you consider these gentleman's statements in your research rather than attempting to discredit them with out any methods precision. Correct? Because otherwise you hold no creditability in your statements/comments/analysis more than they themselves do....
Comment
Comment