Anybody shoot the new Slick Trick Nuke?

[GeauxTigers]

?

[Huntindad]

what's it look like?

[Humper]

what's it look like?

[ATTACH]527235[/ATTACH]

[Humper]

[ATTACH]527236[/ATTACH]

[JDVerfurth]

Looks like a shwacker...

[unclefish]

Sure does look like a shwacker. I don't get the 1.3" profile while in flight.....expands to 1.8" when it hits.

1.3" in flight defeats the purpose of a mechanical. The fixed head slick tricks (of which I am a fan) have a smaller flight profile than this......strange.

[EdO]

I'm shooting the same thing I've always shot. Three bladed muzzie's. Served me well for a lot of years. Work fine. Like Lee Trevino said, "It ain't the arrow, it's the Inidan."

[bowhuntertex]

Interesting. I am a fan if the slick struck products. May have to take a look at these.

[Smokeater]

I'm shooting the same thing I've always shot. Three bladed muzzie's. Served me well for a lot of years. Work fine. Like Lee Trevino said, "It ain't the arrow, it's the Inidan."

Ditto on the muzzy's. I've always wondered who's quote that was! I had a golf coach tell me that one time when I was cussin' my driver!lol

[Mayhem]

i dont care for O-rings on broadheads.

[Slew]

I think they did it right the first time. I've never seen a reason to switch from the standards or magnums. I've got both in my quiver and don't mind either one up front.

[Kdub]

X2 on the magnums. I've been shooting them for years and they work so well for me that I can't justify trying any of the others.

[sambo73]

Anymore info? Anybody try em yet?