It was an elk hunt. They show the elk walking up, cut away then show elk standing and watching them. Strange thing is, There is a blurred out reddish area on the elks flank. Then you see the arrow clearly fly over the elks shoulder and hit the weeds behind it. It was a clear miss with that arrow but....... the blurred out area is suddenly clear and a very bloody wound suddenly shows up as if that missed arrow hit the elk. 
Why do this? If the first arrow (which they never showed) hit the elk why not show that instead of trying to make it look like the second arrow hit the elk?
Do they think we are blind? Stupid?
The arrow clearly missed but to get a "kill shot" on TV they sent a second arrow and made the wound suddenly "appear". It is clear as day what they did. Heck, they even show him holding his bow afterward which is missing two arrows.
Sorry, things like this irk me a bit.
Why do this? If the first arrow (which they never showed) hit the elk why not show that instead of trying to make it look like the second arrow hit the elk?Do they think we are blind? Stupid?
The arrow clearly missed but to get a "kill shot" on TV they sent a second arrow and made the wound suddenly "appear". It is clear as day what they did. Heck, they even show him holding his bow afterward which is missing two arrows. Sorry, things like this irk me a bit.
Comment