Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Birdman Update

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    thanks systemnt-

    Comment


      #77
      Originally posted by HogHunterBall View Post
      Wow so where did the kid story come from? If its all not him and not true...I would be suing because his name is ruined
      People were quick to make assumptions because ICAC got involved so they decided since they read it it must be true. There's a few apologies that are headed to both Chris and Roy's way im sure

      Comment


        #78
        Originally posted by HogHunterBall View Post
        Wow so where did the kid story come from? If its all not him and not true...I would be suing because his name is ruined
        there was no kid story. it said child p which can be any age under 17. a bunch of people just grabbed their torches and pitchforks and ran with it

        Comment


          #79
          Originally posted by quackerback View Post
          there was no kid story. it said child p which can be any age under 17. a bunch of people just grabbed their torches and pitchforks and ran with it
          I meant child parn when I said kid story....somehow child **** has to be involved I would assume. If he was related to it or not

          Sad ordeal

          Comment


            #80
            Originally posted by HogHunterBall View Post
            I meant child parn when I said kid story....somehow child **** has to be involved I would assume. If he was related to it or not

            Sad ordeal
            child **** is a wide ranging thing. anybody that is under 18 is considered a child. so this girl could have posed as an older girl and took pics of herself and sent them to him. just because it says child does not mean it is a little kid.

            Comment


              #81
              WoodlandsRoy glad it's gonna work out. You are a true friend. Never back down.

              Comment


                #82
                I apparently missed something. What charges were filed and when are the hearings?
                No charges, no verdict, no wrong.

                Comment


                  #83
                  Originally posted by quackerback View Post
                  child **** is a wide ranging thing. anybody that is under 18 is considered a child. so this girl could have posed as an older girl and took pics of herself and sent them to him. just because it says child does not mean it is a little kid.
                  Very true...but he is 30 or older, he shouldnt be near 16-18 in that way anyways. To each their own I guess lol

                  Comment


                    #84
                    Originally posted by HogHunterBall View Post
                    Very true...but he is 30 or older, he shouldnt be near 16-18 in that way anyways. To each their own I guess lol
                    This I true however 18 is legal is it not? so that's between him and God if that's what he chose to do and if she aint your daughter or sister and shes of legal age thats their business. Also we don't know the whole story but I read it somewhere that she presented herself to be 21 so that's another factor to consider. I think it's best that we all wait and see what evidence comes out before anyone starts throwing stones but that's just my opinion.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X