I haven't waterfowl hunted since the mid 1990s, and from the time steel shot was mandated until I last hunted, steel shot resulted in crippling many more birds when compared to lead shot (using standard 12 gauge 2.75" and 3" shells). I know that was a common complaint from waterfowl hunters, but when watching some recent YouTube videos about different waterfowl shotshells, I have seen several people talk about how poorly early steel shotshells performed, and that ammo manufacturers have made significant improvements in steel shotshell loads. Noting that the steel shotshells available today perform significantly better than those early steel shotshell loadings. Those videos did not indicate what those improvements are, so I am just curious if anyone can enlighten me on what those changes are, and if you agree that the newer steel shot loads perform significantly better than those early loads, and practical examples (i.e. extend lethality ranges, better patterns, increased pellet penetration, etc). Just for clarification, I am not talking about the addition of 3.5 inch 12 gauge shotshells, just the standard 2.75" and 3" length shells that were commonly available back in the late 1980s to mid 1990s.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Waterfowl Hunting - Historic Changes to Steel Shotshells
Collapse
X
-
Steel is always going to be steel and its lesser density is its downfall. It still has its penetration limit and nothing will change that. To counter that, most shoot 2 sizes larger in steel vs lead. Some advancements such as shot plating and wad design as well as duplexing various shot sizes have improved patterns but that wont change the penetration/density issue. I would suggest trying bismuth. A good compromise between steel and tungsten without breaking the bank and if you shop around in the off season you can find some nice deals. Steel has improved since it first came out but it still isnt great compared to other non toxic shot offerings which are far superior
-
Thanks guys, I know steel is lighter than lead shot, but also significantly harder and therefore less subject to shot deformation as it is compressed and forced out of the barrel, which in theory should cause it to pattern better than lead. When I used standard steel shot back in the day, I always used shot sizes 2 times smaller (#2 steel for most large to medium size ducks and Special steel for teal). Knowing all of the above, I could not imagine how much shotshell makers could really improve steel shot performance from early loadings. I was thinking maybe they had begun using some proprietary gunpowder that achieved higher velocities without increasing pressure and recoil (something like Hornady's Superformance rifle rounds). Other than that I couldn't imagine how steel shot loads could be significantly better than older loads.
Follow up issue, based upon an above statement about improved steel shot plating is this: I've got several boxes of 25-30 year old steel shot, and am now wondering if humidity over time would cause the steel pellets to rust together, as they may not have been plated. If so, my fear is shooting them could result in a solid rusted mass of steel that might damage the barrel or choke tube. Any additional thoughts would be appreciated!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bigfootwolff View PostThanks guys, I know steel is lighter than lead shot, but also significantly harder and therefore less subject to shot deformation as it is compressed and forced out of the barrel, which in theory should cause it to pattern better than lead. When I used standard steel shot back in the day, I always used shot sizes 2 times smaller (#2 steel for most large to medium size ducks and Special steel for teal). Knowing all of the above, I could not imagine how much shotshell makers could really improve steel shot performance from early loadings. I was thinking maybe they had begun using some proprietary gunpowder that achieved higher velocities without increasing pressure and recoil (something like Hornady's Superformance rifle rounds). Other than that I couldn't imagine how steel shot loads could be significantly better than older loads.
Follow up issue, based upon an above statement about improved steel shot plating is this: I've got several boxes of 25-30 year old steel shot, and am now wondering if humidity over time would cause the steel pellets to rust together, as they may not have been plated. If so, my fear is shooting them could result in a solid rusted mass of steel that might damage the barrel or choke tube. Any additional thoughts would be appreciated!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bigfootwolff View PostThanks guys, I know steel is lighter than lead shot, but also significantly harder and therefore less subject to shot deformation as it is compressed and forced out of the barrel, which in theory should cause it to pattern better than lead. When I used standard steel shot back in the day, I always used shot sizes 2 times smaller (#2 steel for most large to medium size ducks and Special steel for teal). Knowing all of the above, I could not imagine how much shotshell makers could really improve steel shot performance from early loadings. I was thinking maybe they had begun using some proprietary gunpowder that achieved higher velocities without increasing pressure and recoil (something like Hornady's Superformance rifle rounds). Other than that I couldn't imagine how steel shot loads could be significantly better than older loads.
Follow up issue, based upon an above statement about improved steel shot plating is this: I've got several boxes of 25-30 year old steel shot, and am now wondering if humidity over time would cause the steel pellets to rust together, as they may not have been plated. If so, my fear is shooting them could result in a solid rusted mass of steel that might damage the barrel or choke tube. Any additional thoughts would be appreciated!
Comment
-
Steel will never kill like lead. But the steel shot of today is definitely better than the early loads. The main thing is it's faster. Old 2 3/4 loads were around 1300 fps like lead, and if you sized up in shot to make up for less density, you had less pellets. The newer wads pattern better. Most are sealed better for corrosion resistance. A quality 3 inch 1 1/4 oz 2 running 1450 fps will kill a duck stone dead at ranges most guys have no business even shooting at. Cheapo xperts with 4 different sizes of shot, not so much. Bismuth does better than steel but is alot more expensive. Tungsten will do amazing things at long ranges IF you can put it in the right spot, most can't. Point is, good steel works just fine for most duck hunting but some situations call for a $5 shell. As for the other issue, unless your shells were stored in poor conditions they should be ok.Last edited by jdg13; 11-03-2023, 05:39 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by El General View Post
Does it require more choke? Hunting a little woody hole tomorrow and shots should be very close.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Here is another little tidbit about steel. Most people used to and some still do want heavy loads. Steel is lighter ,so more shot in a given load based on steel. In the thousands of shells I have patterned my best patterns will usually be in the 1450 -1500 fps range. After that it was harder to keep patterns tighter at distance. One more thing small steel shot like 2's or smaller will choke more like lead . Meaning if you want tighter patterns don't be scared to try IM or if choke is rated for it full choke. This is for longer range. For normal 35-40 or less yards it is tough to beat a light mod choke.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DUKFVR View Post
You should be good,but in pattern work a lot of the time it takes more choke. I shoot IM a lot. You just need to see how your gun patterns with said load.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DUKFVR View Post
You should be good,but in pattern work a lot of the time it takes more choke. I shoot IM a lot. You just need to see how your gun patterns with said load.
Comment
Comment