I think a lot of the reason prices are getting out of control is because instead of focusing on a per acre price, hunters are only concerned about how much they have to pay in total sum terms. I see people bash a $5000 lease spot and say how it's prices like that which ruin the sport, but the price per acre is $10-12. At the same time, they are completely fine with the 300 acre place with 6 guys paying $1000 a person. The second lease is DOUBLE the cost!!!
In reality, it's the 6 guys who accept a $20 per acre price who are driving up the cost of hunting leases, not the ones who pay $5000 to be on a lease. I know there aren't a whole lot of people who can afford $5000 a year to be on a lease, so I dont mean to say that if you can't afford that kind of place then dont hunt. I think if we all tried to keep in mind the per acre price of a lease and refuse to overhunt a piece of land by putting too many people on it, prices would go down.
Thoughts?
In reality, it's the 6 guys who accept a $20 per acre price who are driving up the cost of hunting leases, not the ones who pay $5000 to be on a lease. I know there aren't a whole lot of people who can afford $5000 a year to be on a lease, so I dont mean to say that if you can't afford that kind of place then dont hunt. I think if we all tried to keep in mind the per acre price of a lease and refuse to overhunt a piece of land by putting too many people on it, prices would go down.
Thoughts?
Comment