Ranger Crew vs Kawasaki Transmule

[Death from Above]

Narrowed down to these...gonna be one or the other. You guys have any advice/pros or cons on each. Also looking for a price check as I am willing to travel for a good deal.

Thanks

Brandon

[Walking Eagle]

Two words...

Test Drive

If money isn't a big factor, the test drive will make the decision very easy.

[atombomb]

I've owned, beat on, mudded, marshed, rock crawled, hauled 6 people plus gear,
1500lbs of corn, pulled a 16' trailer with blinds and building stuff around the
lease... it's hard to beat the power, payload, ground clearance and "true" all
four wheels locked 4x4 on a Ranger.....

just depends on if you need that much machine for the money... if not... the mule
would be a good choice also..

[Death from Above]

Is there that big a difference in the price of the two? I crusied in a mule yesterday.....is seems small compared to a ranger. Then again the ranger seemed pretty big.

[CastAndBlast]

we have both. No offense to anyone, but the ranger has more peanuts than the mule by far. Just depends on what you will need it to do. I personally think we have had less problems with the mule, but the ranger works circles around it.

[Biggun]

no comparison ranger

[Big_gun]

This has been discusssed many times on here before... I have a Transmule 2005 and it ran just under $9k.... the Ranger is higher and offers more speed and some more towing ability. I choose the mule cause the Ranger crew was not out then.... The rangers are louder than the mules... I tow mine with a 16 ft trailer tried on a 10' and it was too small, it did it but themule was all I could handle in it. If you have a wide open place the 4 seaters are nice..... tight quarters... you need a quad or a small utv.