Originally posted by Shane
View Post
when comparing the 22 WMR v. the 17 HMR..... it's always a close debate
it basically boils down to flatter shooting 17 vs. slightly more energy down range 22
the 17 HMR makes things "explode" whereas the 22 Magnum seems to "anchor" animals more due to the bullet weight.
the 17 kills because of the "hydrostatic shock value" - speed kills theory and frangible bullet
the 17 HMR is more accurate IMO - 2550 fps with a 17 gr pill
the 22 mag is slightly cheaper to shoot and caries more KE - 2000 fps with a 40 gr pill
22 Mag ammo is more plentiful
Trajectory :
* .17 HMR, 17 grain - +0.1" at 50 yards, 0 at 100 yards, -2.6" at 150 yards.
* .22 WMR, 33 grain - +0.6" at 50 yards, 0 at 100 yards, -4.5" at 150 yards.
Energy :
* .17 HMR, 17 grain - ME 245 ft. lbs., 185 ft. lbs. at 50 yards, 136 ft. lbs. at 100 yards, 99 ft. lbs. at 150 yards, 72 ft. lbs. at 200 yards.
* .22 WMR, 33 grain - ME 293 ft. lbs., 219 ft. lbs. at 50 yards, 164 ft. lbs. at 100 yards, N/A at 150 yards, N/A at 200 yards.
in summary, the 17 HMR has a "fun factor" especially when watching things blow up
both will get the job done at 100 yds , the 17 HMR reaches out farther b/c of it's flat shooting
hope that helps
Comment